I’m sitting in an Evil Franchise* that dispenses legal crack,
trying to work. On the agenda: a manuscript to revise for hoped-for
publication, clients to call, researchers to recruit and train, forty+ emails
to reply to and a blog post for CGO to write. I worked in my office all morning
and most of the afternoon, but my attention span started leaking, so I fled to
the nearest coffeehouse for a fresh environment.
The Evil Franchise* has a cushioned bench about seven feet
long, and three small round tables positioned in front of the bench. I’m one of
three guys using the tables for our computers. Both of the other guys appear to
be in their mid-late twenties.
The Evil Franchise* generates a fair amount of noise with
its java paraphernalia and loud music, but two of us are laboring silently. The
other quiet guy is perched over his laptop in a posture that suggests…intimacy.
He appears to have a relationship with his laptop. He works his keys smoothly,
lovingly and I wonder if this is what Zen looks like.
The third guy? He’s a thumper. Amidst pauses and occasional light keystokes he thunks his keys. Thunk, Thunk…….Thunk…..ThunkThunkTHUNK. Over and over. And over. Thumper reminds me
of a Christian concert pianist I once saw, who, afflicted with boundless
narcissism, pounded the piano keys in a visual equivalent of a cacophony. (Is
there a word for that? Maybe “one person melee”.)
I’m hearing impaired in one ear (for real) but Thumper is on
my better side, and his thunking penetrates the ambient noise of the Evil
Franchise*. For ten minutes I try to soldier
on, but I can barely focus with the thunking. I look at him a few times,
wondering if subtle forms of non-verbal communication might trigger his
awareness of the auditory pollution he’s generating. No.
Then commences the internal debate. Is his noisy clacking
appropriate in a public setting? Am I
being selfish? Is he being selfish? Are
we both being selfish? Should I try another ten minutes of trying to get work done
amidst the distraction? Should I leave? Does the fact that we arrived at the
bench at precisely the same moment matter? Does Christian love mean I just
leave the Evil Franchise* and find a different place to work? Does Christian
forbearance require that I simply endure, and do the best I can where I am,
even though ten minutes have shown little will be accomplished?
Is such an instance in view when Paul tells the Philippians,
“Do nothing out of vain ambition or selfish conceit but, in humility, consider
others better than yourselves. Each of you should look not only to your own
interests, but also to the interests of others” (2:3-4)? Is this situation
governed by Jesus’ commands to turn the other cheek, to go a second mile, to
give your tunic also to the one who asks for your cloak?
Should Christians let irritations go? If love and
faithfulness never leave me, if I bind them around my neck (Prov 3:3), will
such irritations within me simply dissipate? If the indwelling Holy Spirit reigns in my life, would the fruit of the
Spirit-- love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, faithfulness, gentleness and
self-control—mean I don’t even become
irritated by Thumper’s drum solo?
As the thunked keys approached triple digits, clarity
emerged. I’m not saying correctness emerged, just clarity.
I pulled my heretofore effective ear plug out of my ear (the
other ear doesn’t work) and said to him, “May I ask you a question?”
He shrugged and leaned toward me. “Sure.”
I paused. Now that I’m here how do I say this? What’s the
diplomatic, Christian love way to say this?
Who cares, just say it!
“If you were to die tonight, how sure are you that you would
go to heaven?”
Just kidding. I actually asked, “Is there anyway you could
tap your keyboard more quietly. You are thunking
your keys (and I thunked my keyboard twice) loudly, and it’s hard for me to
focus on work.”
He looked at me with a surprised look, then his face erased
like an Etch-a-Sketch. He leaned back to his computer without a word. I put my
earplug back in, wondering if I had morphed into a pressurized part of the
human anatomy in his mind. In my peripheral vision I noticed Quiet Guy staring
at me in astonishment before returning to his affair.
Thumper began to work more quietly. His thunking became
rarer, and quieter. He seemed discomfited. I wonder, since I had made him
aware, if he now couldn’t help but hear his thunking. I don’t know, but he
seemed like he was trying to be quieter, but he was dealing with an ingrained
habit. Ten minutes after my question he packed up and left.
Should Christians contest irritations? What factors should
be considered?
--- --- ---
* I don’t consider the coffeehouse chain to be evil, but I
keep running into people who freely, vehemently condemn the company for all
manner of evil. These are people who also say one should not judge.
© 2008, Glenn Lucke.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Great questions with many
Fri, 01/11/2008 - 10:33 — Stephanie (not verified)Great questions with many shades of grey! Sometimes love happens in HOW you communicate, not just whether you choose to communicate an annoyance. Do you express your desire for him to stop pounding (or whatever the irritation is) with love, humility, and kindness so that you don't simply shut him down and compel him to comply? Or does your tone convey irritation, frustration and disapproval to him. Maybe it's helpful to reframe love in this way before acting.
Frankly, while I've certainly
Sun, 01/13/2008 - 11:44 — Kristin (not verified)Frankly, while I've certainly been in your position before, your question--"Is his noisy clacking appropriate in a public setting?"---stands out to me. Coffee shops have indeed become makeshift offices for many of us, but they're still public settings and we have just as little right to ask loud clackers to stop as we do to beg the silence of chatty teenage girls discussing innane topics. It's a coffee shop, not a library. Christian or not, we can't impose our desires for silence in a place that hardly requires it.
Is irritation some form of
Sun, 01/13/2008 - 12:58 — Sarah Grace (not verified)Is irritation some form of anger? What's the bible verse, don't let the sun go down on your anger? Perhaps we could stretch that sentiment to say we can't be reconciled to our neighbor who irritates us unless we speak up. To not call him out on it would be to hold it against him and to not love him in brotherly love. Maybe?
But do we even consider the people in coffee shops as brothers or sisters? Or even as neighbors? Would you want to be disrupted and told you're annoying somebody? Lastly, my feelings on certain coffee shops are not: it is not a place where "we are one big family happily working together and sipping caffeine"; but, rather, a place where " groups of one man islands can be part of an archipelago." (Sometimes, on the other hand, they are great places for a meeting of minds.)
Kristin, I'm puzzled by the
Sun, 01/13/2008 - 13:11 — GL (not verified)Kristin,
I'm puzzled by the words of your comment. I'll focus on one that puzzled me. "Christian or not, we can't impose our desires for silence in a place that hardly requires it."
I am not sure why you used the word "silence". I had no such desire. :) And without a desire for silence, I had no impulse to "impose" "silence."
If you re-read what I wrote, I think you'll see that I asked the guy if could type "more quietly." Not silence, but more quietly.
It's possible that asking for "more quietly" is also inappropriate, but to keep the discussion on this specific track I hope to focus on what actually happened, not something that didn't happen.
Cary Tennis—Salon’s advice
Sun, 01/13/2008 - 22:17 — John Jones (not verified)Cary Tennis—Salon’s advice columnist—posted an article a few days ago on how he is affected by his readers’ feedback, and part of that article addresses the subject of this post. The two sections I’ve posted below follow a (really) long list of things that Tennis personally dislikes. Here he discusses his reaction to his knowledge of those dislikes, directly addressing the subject of irritability.
“I would like to pierce the veil of reality and see how fruitless and misguided are my multifarious episodes of automatic disapproval and scorn. I wonder frequently at my own vast and cruel arsenal of put-down. I marvel at my ability to seize on the tiniest aspect of a person as representative of their worth. I am appalled at my own irritability. I see myself hurrying by a crowd standing in a corridor and I hear my own voice asking why they don't move aside more quickly for me; someone brushes against me and I think why is he so clumsy and thoughtless; I see young people in a group and I ... on and on and on.”
In the context of Glenn’s post, what I thought was most interesting about the article was the following section,—which appears directly above the chunk of text I quoted above—where Tennis discusses his view of the worth of his dislikes and irritations:
“while I dislike so many thousands of things with great and vivid intensity, I do not consider my dislike of these things to be a source of wisdom, or a cause of action, or a premise for public expression, or evidence of critical acumen, or a guide to living, or an emotion I wish to impart to you so you can share in it, or an admirable fact about which people will say, at my funeral, ‘He disliked a great many things, and for this we will remember him always.’ ”
The rest of the article is worth the read.
John
the link: http://www.salon.com/mwt/col/tenn/2008/01/11/midlife_depression/
John, Great piece; he's a
Mon, 01/14/2008 - 08:34 — GL (not verified)John,
Great piece; he's a vivid writer.
What I wonder about are situations like people scratching a chalkboard with their fingers, clicking pens during a worship service, talking during a movie, and on and on.
I suspect many people, you included, put these matters in the realm of grey. I.e. these are probably not black and white ethical matters. In the grey, are there obligations that humans have to other images of God to seek the peace and not disturb others needlessly?
There are needful irritations-- jackhammering at 3am by City of Austin water engineers to fix a broken water main near one's home. Losing needed sleep is irritating, but in the context of fixing a broken water main it's understandable.
But a group of teens talking and laughing loudly in a movie theater, irritating 300 others who wish to experience the movie undisturbed, is not needful. Should such an irritation be contested? I think probably. If a ten-year old boy in a worship service is fascinated by the clicking of his retractable pen during the sermon, should his parents signal to him to stop? If so, why?
And on and on.
Thanks once again, Glenn, for
Mon, 01/14/2008 - 11:52 — Vicky (not verified)Thanks once again, Glenn, for a thought-provoking post on what it means to deal with life as a Christian. I need my thoughts provoked about how to live and what to do "in the grey". I wish it were easier for me to withdraw energy from interacting with irritations and put the energy where it's needed. I also think it's really important for me to keep thinking about what to do with irritation and other emotions which can easily ease down a slippery slope into resentment and bitterness which can be toxic to a Christian or to anyone else for that matter.
I love the question, and it
Mon, 01/14/2008 - 12:22 — Chris (not verified)I love the question, and it is one that I have thought about before. Here’s my initial reaction…
I suppose I would ask two questions. First, is the behavior in itself wrong or just irritating to me due to my idiosyncrasies? If the behavior is morally wrong, I think we have much greater freedom to say something. If it is just one of my pet peeves, though, the bar is higher.
My roommate smacks when he eats cereal. It is terribly loud and it’s really hard for me to concentrate on anything when he is eating. If I’m sitting at the table reading something important and he sits down to eat, I have several options. I can sit there and deal with the distraction silently, I can say something, or I can leave.
Here the second question would be what is the loving thing for my roommate. Smacking is not morally wrong. I think Philippians 2:3-4 is the correct passage to look to. We are to regard others as more important than ourselves. This means seeking their best interest over ours. If telling him about the smacking will help him, maybe I should tell him. But if it will make him uncomfortable and force him to leave, shouldn’t I be the one to leave instead?
This admits a lot of grey area, as far as discerning how the person will react, but I would think a good rule might be to always assume pain/discomfort/suffering on yourself, rather than risking putting it on another.
As for the Starbucks encounter, I think that you should either bear the annoyance or move yourself. There is nothing morally wrong with loud typing. That person is either ignorant of the annoyance, or cognizant and not regarding you as more important than himself. If the latter, it is not our job to make him regard us as important. And if it is the former, we may very well make him uncomfortable and force him to leave (as he did), thereby forcing on him the discomfort that we could otherwise bear in his stead.
I think the answer may be different if, as your more recent examples of the boy in church and the kids in the theater illustrate, the annoyance affects others. Here we can serve them by contesting the irritation and not simply ourselves.
Chris, Good thoughts and
Mon, 01/14/2008 - 23:23 — GL (not verified)Chris,
Good thoughts and questions.
It's **possible** that a graciously phrased notice to your roommate would help him. When I think about such matters I try, fallibly, to put myself in the other's position. For example, on many a church and parachurch retreat I have said to roommates/cabinmates, "If I snore, please hit me, wake me, something. I think it's wrong if I make noise that keeps you fellows awake."
From what I'm told, I rarely snore, but I give them freedom to deal with my snoring because I would not want to interfere with them.
If I became aware that I was smacking as I ate cereal, and that smacking disturbed someone else, I would try to cease that smacking immediately. Part of this is the manners with which my parents reared me; much of etiquette, manners and polite society is acting in a way so as not to encroach on others in an untoward way. Thus, I do want to be notified if I'm doing something that is irritating to another.
Back in college days, in the dorms, I thought the principle of "My freedom ends where yours begins" made a lot of sense and it worked well. Students on my hall and I were free to listen to music, but not so loudly as to encroach on others. We were free to be messy in our own rooms or sections of a room, but not messy in the public areas.
Logically, I can't see that as a one way street. Theologically, even if others I'm around don't think theologically or think in different religious traditions, I think that the image of God concept is a two way street. We exist in relation to one another, with obligations to "the Other."
This is a great question that
Tue, 01/15/2008 - 10:06 — Alex (not verified)This is a great question that I don’t have the answer to, and I’d imagine it depends on specifics of each circumstance. Let me throw out an example that I have often wondered about. I have a relative with severe Tourette’s Syndrome. Once when I was a kid, a neighbor asked us to keep our dog quiet at night, and my mom had to explain that we didn’t have a dog – just a family member with TS. Another time, this relative was ticketed for public disturbance, and another time was given an eviction notice after tremendous complaining from neighbors. Clearly, this is more extreme than the smacking example that was given, but having lived with this, I feel more sensitive to just how irritable I and others in our culture are with our neighbors. I don’t know how to sort it all out, but I’d say that even though I think there’s a legit place for pointing out irritations, there’s even more of a place for looking in the mirror and asking ourselves why we’re so easily irritated.
Appreciate the honest
Tue, 01/15/2008 - 18:27 — Greg (not verified)Appreciate the honest question.
What bothers us might tell us something about ourselves. Have you ever gone through a terribly difficult trial only to find out that what bothered you beforehand no longer does? What changed? Robinson Crusoe was really bugged with everything about the Island of Despair he was trapped on. But then, after almost being swept away to sea when testing his new dugout canoe, he was elated to be back on the island and loved everything about it. Laying on the beach exhausted, he wrote, "I fell on my knees and gave God thanks for my deliverance, resolving to lay aside all thoughts of my deliverance [from the Island] and refreshing myself with such things as I had."
Don't get me wrong - I am irritated by a lot. But it seems that growth in Christ will somehow, eventually, yield an increasing delighting in hardships and enduring much. Somehow, Paul was able to write, "I know what it is to be in need, and I know what it is to have plenty. I have learned the secret of being content in any and every situation, whether well fed or hungry, whether living in plenty or in want, whether being forced to sit next to a thunker, or next to a saint." - Ph 4:12, loose edition
On the other hand, I confess I am one of the thunkers. Sorry 'bout that, Glenn. I flip pens, tap pencils and all that annoying stuff. Scripture has a challenge for us thunkers, too: "If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone." Rom 12:8. I guess if I am going to be able to do that, you're going to have to let me know if I am disturbing the peace!
I believe your approach is
Thu, 01/24/2008 - 08:53 — Glenn (MTC Church) (not verified)I believe your approach is christian!
Earlier I was reading Webber's post on how spirituality is not a discipline of do's and dont's, this post made more sense.
Paul said, "look to the interests of others".. by gently letting them know that their thunking