Christmas is a necessity; if it didn’t exist, we’d have to
invent it.
Various actors in the public sphere see Christmas as a
battleground in the culture war (Nissenbaum,
The Battle for Christmas, scholarly;
Gibson,
The War on Christmas, popular).
Contesting Christmas—what the actors say Christmas means-- is itself a business, and business is good. People of faith
skirmish with secularists, put-Christ-back-into-Christmas devotees battle
merchants for hearts and wallets, and a few remnant Puritans give nearly
inaudible voice to their centuries old complaint that Christmas, a date on the
liturgical calendar, is not biblical.
Except for the debate about secularism in the public sphere,
the above paragraph could describe American society in 1905 and earlier. Leigh Schmidt,
Professor of Religion at Princeton, tells the story of
the construction of Christmas in America
in Consumer
Rites: The Buying and Selling of American Holidays. Schmidt’s work is a
superb piece of social history that is also a delight to read. In mustering
diaries, handbills, sermons, newspaper articles and various advertisements, Schmidt
shows that “the holiday was transformed through the intricately braided
processes of domestication, Christianization, and commercialization.” (108)
Today’s opposing camps jousted in similar fashion nearly two hundred years ago.
The rich heritage of varied Christmases in Europe deposited as many Christmases through arriving colonists. Shaping factors include class and geography,
the latter being something of a proxy for denomination. Puritans and their
heirs in New England sought to suppress Christmas. Those
Protestants more influenced by Rome,
who preserved the Roman liturgical calendar, tended to inhabit the middle and
southern colonies. They celebrated a twelve day season of festivity that
naturally included feasts with abundant food and drink.
However, according to Schmidt, Americans initially focused
more of the season’s revelry on the New Year. “Plebians” caroused in drunken
celebration, inviting both class-based and religious censure. For New Years,
the gentility practiced stylized calling on friends and gift-giving, which soon
spiraled in ever more materialistic display. Puritans denounced the pagan
revelry, while less or non-Reformed evangelicals innovated the “watch-night”
practice of watching in the New Year through repentance, prayer and “pious
resolutions,” the forerunner to today’s
non-religious New Year’s Resolutions.
During the early and mid-1800s, Protestants came to a
cross-roads. “…the holidays, like the consumer culture, were terribly alluring,
and in combination they were doubly so…..This growing alignment of evangelical
Protestants behind the modern Christmas was integral to the holiday’s cultural
ascent.” (121) The family-centeredness of feasting and the emergence of the
concept of coddling children with gifts played on evangelical sentiments, and
soon they accepted the blandishments of merchants and the spectacles of museums
in relocating New Years giving to Christmas. Always the weaker partner in
negotiating with culture, the Church (or much of it) accepted and then actively
participated in both commercializing and “Christianizing” Christmas.
Lest this seem too impersonal (“commercialization”), we
should remember that agents drove these developments. Saint Nicholas didn’t
‘just happen’ to evolve, he was intentionally developed by agents- writers,
advertisers, merchants. Perhaps most of the ingredients already existed for
development, but the myth of Santa the droll elf with an infinite bag of gifts
was constructed and then standardized intentionally. (in rich detail, 130-148)
The balance of Schmidt’s tale, and highly worth reading,
concerns the put-Christ-in-Christmas protests. Some of Schmidt’s sources seem
genuine, but most, as he says, accommodated to such a degree that their
protest-cum-acceptance essentially
consecrated the consumer Christmas we have now.
Christmas, one might say, is imago humanae. As with other phenomena in culture, we make
Christmas, and then Christmas graciously returns the favor. Christmas is a
necessity, so we invented it.
© 2005, Glenn Lucke.
Bookmark/Search this post with
I enjoyed meeting you and the
Sat, 12/24/2005 - 01:47 — Sherry (not verified)I enjoyed meeting you and the ohter bloggers at the dinner the other night. Gene Veith has a blog post at the Worldmag blog Cranach, In Defense of the Commercialization of Christmas, that relates tangentially and that you might find interesting.
Thanks for the sociology
Tue, 12/27/2005 - 18:56 — Brian (not verified)Thanks for the sociology lesson, Glenn. I am afraid I need remedial sociology courses. They don't teach that stuff in engineering.