Update: This is Part 1 of a series on community by Corey Widmer.
For Part 2 click (here).
-------------------------------------
Our story began when a group of friends at the University of Virginia were introduced to the
vision of the Christian Community Development Association (www.ccda.org), founded by John Perkins. As we took
trips together down to Jackson, MS to see Perkins’ original CCDA experiment, we
were drawn to his vision for urban renewal that was grounded in the theology of
the incarnation. Perkins’ conviction was that the blighted inner city would be
renewed most effectively not by churches lofting in money and mission trips
from the suburbs, but by Christians relocating into urban communities to be
good neighbors and share in the plight of the poor as their own. A group of us
committed to pray and explore whether we might one day do this together.
Six years later, we saw our dream materialize in a part of
inner city Richmond, VA
called Church Hill. We moved into the neighborhood with three other married
couples from UVA, all of whom now live within five blocks of each other. My wife Sarah and I were the last to arrive
in the summer of ’05, and because we had not yet found a house we moved into
the home of our friends Danny and Mary Kay Avula, comfortably settling into
their spare room. But Sarah was seven and a half months pregnant, and D-Day was
coming closer by the day. By early August we had not found a house, and we
realized it was not going to work for us to be living in this small room with a
new-born baby.
So in mid August, just two weeks before Sarah’s delivery
date, we had a “community meeting” in the Avulas’ living room. Sarah and I
explained the predicament to the three other couples, told them that we felt it
was best to get into a different living situation, and that our most viable
option was a rental. They listened politely, and then someone replied, “We’ve
come up with a better plan.” They went on to explain the plan: one of the
couples, Lawson and Romesh Wijesooriya, would move out of their house and into
the Avulas’ home, and Sarah and I could then move into the Wijesooriya’s house
and live there with our new baby until our own house was secure (you have to
read that sentence again for it to make sense!). We were immediately resistant
to the idea. It was too out of hand. Too contrived. And too beyond the
boundaries of appropriate conceptions of personal property. So we protested a
bit, but I’ll never forget the near instantaneous response of one of the women:
“If we don’t bear each others’ burdens in times like this, then this whole
community thing is a farce.” She was right. It was our first real test of
whether this idea of Christian community was actually operational, or whether
it was simply a wispy vision without any teeth.
So we did it. Sarah and I and our new baby girl moved into
the Wijesooriyas’ house, while they moved out and stayed with the Avulas. For
10 ½ months. While it may have been hard for the four of them to share space
for so long, I believe it was far harder for us to receive such a gracious
gift. It required a serious admission of need, a blow to pride, and a healthy
loss of baseless dignity to accept such a generous offer. But no experience has
taught us more powerfully about grace fleshed out concretely in Christians relationships,
reflecting Jesus’ promise that “there is no one who has left house…for my sake
who will not receive a hundredfold now in this time” (Mark 10:29-30), a promise
that surely was given in the context of community.
Looking back, this experience grounded our journey living
together in this neighborhood, challenged and re-shaped our implicit
assumptions about the normal parameters of community, and moved us toward a
more generous posture with what we’ve been given.
Bookmark/Search this post with
"Perkins’ conviction was that
Sun, 11/30/2008 - 16:22 — john murden (not verified)"Perkins’ conviction was that the blighted inner city would be renewed most effectively not by churches lofting in money and mission trips from the suburbs, but by Christians relocating into urban communities to be good neighbors and share in the plight of the poor as their own."
I'm a neighbor and I very much admire and respect what Corey & everyone are up to, but I wonder if there isn't a more inclusive word than "Christians" for the sentence quoted. Not all good work is done under Christian auspices, nor even in the name of any religion.
John, I see three contexts
Mon, 12/01/2008 - 00:51 — GL (not verified)John,
I see three contexts that are pertinent in Corey's post: 1) the context of Perkins' teaching, 2) the context of Corey's personal spiritual journey to live in Church Hill and 3) the context of Corey writing about his personal journey at a Christian blog.
All three contexts are explicitly Christian.
Are you troubled that Christians having forms of conversations with other Christians and privately thinking through matters would articulate these thoughts in public?
Are you bothered that Christians thinking through how to live their lives following their God would do so in a Christian manner?
I think you drew an incorrect inference because (my hunch, I could be wrong) you insufficiently took into account the contexts. I doubt (but don't know) that Perkins would assert that exclusively Christians can live in a way that is helpful to blighted areas. I know that Corey doesn't think one has to be a Christian to spur beneficial outcomes for others.
A better inference is this: when Perkins, a Christian leader, was teaching Christian college students about making a difference in the inner city, he said that churches lofting money and mission trips wasn't the way to do it.
What's wrong with a Christian leader instructing younger Christians on a more effective manner for Christian churches to implement their mission?
I'm not bothered or troubled,
Mon, 12/01/2008 - 05:42 — john m (not verified)I'm not bothered or troubled, per se, but wanted to reach back from the specific local that is so central to Corey's experience and share that this is not limited to those of a religious bent. My context is the specific, real-world geographic context that I share with Corey.
The paragraph of the 2nd piece to this that begins "This commitment has been transformative of our attitudes..." captures very well my experience. One of my great lessons from focussing so locally is that so many of the things that can be divisive at a national level (politics, religion, class) can be muted or really made irrelevant.
In our neighborhood, it is obvious what are the right things to be doing for the kids, for the elderly, for the single moms. We also have the opportunity build and appreciate a community where folks with different outlooks work and live together. Embracing a specific physical community hopefully includes appreciation for the full diversity of the area, Christian or not.